Sunday, March 4, 2012

Becky's Books: The Hunger Games vs Battle Royale

So I just started my spring break, which means I actually have time to read...books other than the ones I have to read for my Victorian Lit class, anyway. Don't get me wrong, Villette, Mary Barton and Great Expectations are amazing books (I actually hae found them all interesting, which is a first when it comes to required reading). But there's something about being able to sit down on my bed and read a page of the book without having to analyze every single word on it and go to Sparknotes to figure out what the hell I just read.

And now for my first spring break read: The Hunger Games!
Everyone has been talking about these books. You literally can't miss hearing about The Hunger Games. With the movie coming out, it's going to be the next "Harry Potter", the next "Twilight"...whatever. The three series are completely different...I don't know how they keep getting compared. My mom read these books though, and loved them, which is a good sign. She never could get through the Potter series.

Anyway, in case you haven't seen, the books are about a dystopian society divided into 12 districts, each responsible for some form of the industry: mining, fishing, etc. Every year each district must send two children to fight in the Hunger Games. The twenty-four kids fight to the death, for there can be only one survivor. And the whole thing just happens to be broadcast on TV.

Yes, this is a teen book.

Barnes and Noble gave me a free copy of Mockingjay, the third book in the trilogy, when I bought my Nook Color a few weeks ago. I don't really know why, but it compelled me to read the books over again. You see, I read the first two books in high school before they became a big thing. At the time, I was meh about them...because they had already been done before.
Meet Battle Royale, a book translated from Japanese that I read during my wee years as a high school freshman. A group of students think that they are going on a field trip when they instead are gassed on the bus and awaken on an isolated island. They soon learn they are part of a military training program called, aptly, "The Program", and are required to fight the other members of their class to the death. If not everyone dies in a twenty-four hour period, everyone dies. Only one may survive. Sound familiar?

At the time, I called The Hunger Games as a blatant rip-off of Battle Royale. However, upon rereading them I'm realizing how different the two books really are. Battle Royale is very descriptive of its killings, and is faster-paced...the whole thing takes place in 24-hours versus almost a week during the Hunger Games. Whereas in Royale all the students knew each other and we really delve into their backgrounds, there is little unity between the kids of The Hunger Games. And finally, the purpose of the Hunger Games is to provide entertainment for the country's citizens (how disgusting is that?), whereas in Battle Royale the whole thing is a top secret mission.

I recommend reading both books and seeing which you like better. I'm almost done with The Hunger Games, and for some reason I'm loving it a lot more than I remember. I have the other two books still to get through, but they're pretty quick reads and I think I'll finish them by the end of break.

I'm starting to realize why these books have made such an impact on teenagers, though. I was absolutely devastated when I first read Battle Royale, and I can honestly say the book changed my views on human nature: really, when it comes right down to it, do we all have the ability to kill, just for the sake of survival? The Hunger Games has a similar story, but it still is teaching the same message. We may all be humans, but that doesn't mean we're capable of killing each other.

I'll keep you postponed as I read Catching Fire and Mockingjay!


--Becky

5 comments:

  1. The hunger games is actually one of the best series ever (after Harry Potter naturally). Although it is written at a 5th grade level, it is still interesting because the idea is that humans are losing their humanity in a way. I thought the message was very profound despite the writing level. And my favorite was catching fire, so enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Asilia! I've started Catching Fire and so far I love it...no sophomore slump there. I'm glad these books are making such an impact on so many people.

      --Becky

      Delete
  2. I followed you from the Blogaholic network. Awesome blog by the way!
    Jeannette
    www.walkingonbookshelves.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jeannette! I just followed yours too :)
      --Becky

      Delete
  3. Hi Becky, I know this is a really old post, but I like to browse people's first few posts just because ...

    I actually thought Battle Royale was more profound and more sinister than Hunger Games. Hunger Games is a gladiatorial dystopian, but for me Battle Royale was a criticism of the sadistic totalitarianism, a hyperbolic version of the very conservative, iron-fisted disciplinary culture of the Japanese. I also think it's sicker that a class of students who've shared camaraderie (or some depth of bonding) were still driven to kill each other when pushed into mayhem and fear.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are going to moderation for the meantime. I've just been receiving too much spam! Still, please comment, I'll make sure your comments appear as quickly as possible :) Also, leave behind your blog URL so I can visit it! Thank you!
--Becky